website-and-documentation/content/en/docs/solution/design/proposal-local-deployment.md
Stephan Lo f797af114b test: configure comprehensive markdown linting with Docsy best practices
Configure markdownlint with rules aligned to technical documentation
standards and Docsy theme conventions.

Design Decisions:
- Enable core quality rules (heading hierarchy, consistent list styles)
- Allow inline HTML for Docsy shortcodes and components
- Permit bare URLs (common in technical documentation)
- Make code block language hints optional (pragmatic for existing content)
- Set maximum 2 consecutive blank lines (balanced readability)
- Enforce single trailing newline (POSIX standard)
- Use asterisk for unordered lists (consistency)
- Allow 2-space list indentation (Markdown standard)

Auto-fixed Issues:
- Converted dash lists to asterisk lists (568 fixes)
- Removed trailing spaces (211 fixes)
- Added missing trailing newlines (74 fixes)
- Added blank lines around lists and headings (100+ fixes)

Remaining Style Warnings (intentionally accepted):
- MD029: List numbering variations in meeting notes (75 instances)
- MD036: Bold text for section headers in ADRs (13 instances)
- MD025: Multiple H1 in notes/brainstorming docs (10 instances)
- MD032/MD022: Minor spacing variations (15 instances)

Test Results:
 Hugo build: 227 pages generated successfully
 HTML validation: No errors
 Link checking: All links valid (except dev-only livereload)
 Markdown linting: Only non-critical style warnings remain

The configuration balances strict quality checks with pragmatic
flexibility for diverse content types (documentation, ADRs, meeting
notes, tutorials).
2025-10-23 14:25:46 +02:00

969 B

title weight description
Agnostic EDF Deployment 2 The implementation of EDF must be kubernetes provider agnostic
  • Type: Proposal
  • Owner: Stephan Lo (stephan.lo@telekom.de)
  • Reviewers: EDF Architects
  • Status: Speculative, revision 0.1

Background

EDF is running as a controlplane - or let's say an orchestration plane, correct wording is still to be defined - in a kubernetes cluster. Right now we have at least ArgoCD as controller of manifests which we provide as CNOE stacks of packages and standalone packages.

Proposal

The implementation of EDF must be kubernetes provider agnostic. Thus each provider specific deployment dependency must be factored out into provider specific definitions or deployment procedures.

Local deployment

This implies that EDF must always be deployable into a local cluster, whereby by 'local' we mean a cluster which is under the full control of the platform engineer, e.g. a kind cluster on their laptop.