ea824bde1c
After realizing my mistake on my proposed fixes in #1028, I figured I could at least propose another test covering the use of contexts in `jobs.<job-id>.strategy.matrix`. The specification for available contexts is [here](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/contexts#context-availability): | Workflow key | Context | | -------------------- | ----------- | | `jobs.<job_id>.strategy` | `github`, `needs`, `vars`, `inputs` | In Forgejo, the `forge` and `forgejo` contexts are supported in addition to `github`. The new test covers a matrix with [`include`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/workflow-syntax#jobsjob_idstrategymatrixinclude), [`exclude`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/workflow-syntax#jobsjob_idstrategymatrixexclude) and custom properties. Both available and unavailable contexts are tested. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> <!--URL:https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner--> - other - [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1033): <!--number 1033 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Y2hvcmU6IHRlc3Q6IGV4ZXJjaXNlIGNvbnRleHRzIGluIG1hdHJpeCB3aGVuIHZhbGlkYXRpbmcgd29ya2Zsb3dz-->chore: test: exercise contexts in matrix when validating workflows<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Co-authored-by: 2franix <code@c.defx.fr> Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1033 Reviewed-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.code.forgejo.org> Co-authored-by: 2franix <2franix@noreply.code.forgejo.org> Co-committed-by: 2franix <2franix@noreply.code.forgejo.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| artifactcache | ||
| cacheproxy | ||
| common | ||
| container | ||
| exprparser | ||
| filecollector | ||
| jobparser | ||
| lookpath | ||
| model | ||
| runner | ||
| schema | ||
| workflowpattern | ||